Should Social Media Humiliation Be Part Of A Legal Punishment?

A Spanish YouTuber known as Dalas Review (real name Daniel Santomé) was involved in what would ordinarily be a forgettable legal case only tabloids would follow. After a messy breakup with his girlfriend, he posted nine videos to more than 10 million subscribers on his popular YouTube channel calling her father an “abuser,” and a “sick coward who’s messed up in the head.” After a judge found him liable for defamation, he ordered an unusual sentence. In addition to paying the fine, he was ordered to "read his sentence weekly on his channel for a month."

In essence, the ruling uses the YouTuber's fame against him. Is this a precedent we might start to see in other legal cases? And is it even ethical to mandate humiliation as a punishment? This may seem like an innocent and clear cut case ... after all, he did use his platform to commit the crime, in the eyes of the judge, so there is a certain symmetry to the ruling. I can see both sides here. What do you think?