MARCH 2, 2021|SOCIAL MEDIA
Do Spreaders of Misinformation Deserve to Get Banned Permanently?
Twitter announced a “strike system” that will ban repeat spreaders of misinformation after their fifth warning. There is no denying the negative effects that deliberate liars and fire-starters can have on the world. Many of them knowingly use falsehoods to selfishly grow their own platforms. Some deeply believe in the misinformation and their free speech right (depending on where they live) to share what they think no matter what.
Do they deserve to get deplatformed and banned for life? Is this practice serving a greater purpose or introducing a shady gray area where platforms like Twitter get to decide who has a voice and who doesn't? At the moment, it seems the answer to this question might depend mostly on whether you agree with the choices of who is getting banned.
Related Posts
Book Rohit To Speak
Want to bring these ideas to your next event?
Rohit turns the thinking behind posts like this one into keynotes for audiences around the world, from Fortune 500 leadership teams to global industry conferences.
Learn More About Speaking
How It All Started
A Short Backstory Of This Blog
This is a blog about non-obvious ideas. Originally launched on the Typepad platform in 2005 as the Influential Marketing blog, the stories at first focused mainly on digital marketing while Rohit worked at Ogilvy Advertising. In 2015 Rohit officially rebranded to the Non-Obvious Insights Blog and published his WSJ bestseller Non-Obvious. For the past twenty one years, this blog has coined new terms, introduced future marketing practices and inspired the next generation of non-obvious thinkers and marketers.




